LLM Inference Optimization 2026: Batching, KV Cache and Speculative Decoding Explained

📘 Tutorials 2026-08-11 2 min read

Your self-hosted model serves 2 tokens per second and the GPU is half idle. The big wins in inference speed come from a few well-understood techniques. What are they and how much do they actually help?

💡 What You Will Learn

Your self-hosted model serves 2 tokens per second and the GPU is half idle. The big wins in inference speed come from a few well-understood techniques. What are they and how much do they actually help

📜 Table of Contents

The Bottleneck Nobody Sees

LLM inference is memory-bound, not compute-bound: generating each token streams the whole model through memory. This one fact explains every optimization below - they all reduce memory traffic or reuse what is already loaded.

Technique 1: Continuous Batching

Instead of processing one request at a time, the server interleaves many requests in the same forward pass. This is the single biggest throughput win - engines like vLLM (88,691 stars) and SGLang (31,628 stars) report 10-24x throughput versus naive serving. Latency per request barely changes; total requests per second jumps.

Technique 2: KV Cache

Every generated token attends to all previous tokens; the engine caches those attention keys/values instead of recomputing them. Without a KV cache, cost per token grows linearly with sequence length. Modern engines also quantize the KV cache (4-bit or 8-bit) to fit longer contexts in memory - llama.cpp and vLLM both support it.

Technique 3: Speculative Decoding

A small draft model proposes the next several tokens; the big model verifies them in parallel. When the draft is right (60-80% of the time with a well-matched draft), you generate several tokens in the time of one. Practical speedups: 1.5-3x on consumer hardware, higher on some workloads.

Technique 4: Quantization and Weight Sharing

The quantization guide covers the quality side; the speed side is that 4-bit weights halve memory traffic. Some models also use grouped-query attention (GQA), which shrinks the KV cache - a big deal for long contexts.

How Much Does Each Help (Realistic)

Technique Throughput gain Effort
Continuous batching 10-24x switch to vLLM/SGLang
KV cache (already in engines) baseline none
KV cache quantization 1.2-2x context capacity config flag
Speculative decoding 1.5-3x add draft model
4-bit quantization ~2x memory traffic convert model

The Practical Playbook

  1. If you serve an API: switch to vLLM or SGLang today - batching alone changes everything.
  2. If you run local single-user: llama.cpp with a Q4 model plus speculative decoding is the max you will get without a bigger GPU.
  3. Measure tokens/sec and p95 latency before and after each change; do not trust blog numbers on your hardware.
Related Articles
2026-08-08
A Hidden Windows 11 Bug Quietly Swells Your C Drive by 100GB+ — the Patch Only Arrives July 14
2026-08-05
59.5GB for the iGPU! Intel's New Driver Pushes Shared Memory Cap to 93%
2026-08-01
Microsoft Open-Sources a Free Linux Operating System, Yes, From Microsoft!

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first!

Login to comment