RAGAS: Open Source LLM Evaluation Framework Tutorial for 2026
RAGAS is the leading open-source framework for evaluating RAG pipelines with 14,855 GitHub stars. This tutorial covers both metric families - retrieval (context precision/recall) and generation (faithfulness/answer relevancy/correctness) - plus installation, dataset creation, and judge-LLM (GPT-4 or Claude) setup.
💡 What You Will Learn
RAGAS is the leading open-source framework for evaluating RAG pipelines with 14,855 GitHub stars. This tutorial covers both metric families - retrieval (context precision/recall) and generation (faith
📜 Table of Contents
RAGAS (RAG Assessment) is the leading open source framework for evaluating RAG pipelines. With 14,855 stars on GitHub, it is the tool most AI engineers reach for.
What RAGAS Measures
Retrieval Metrics
- Context Precision: Are top-ranked docs the most relevant?
- Context Recall: Did we retrieve all relevant docs?
Generation Metrics
- Faithfulness: Does answer stay within context?
- Answer Relevancy: Does answer address the question?
- Answer Correctness: Is answer factually correct?
Installation
pip install ragas
You need a judge LLM (GPT-4 or Claude) to score answers.
import os
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-key-here"
Creating a Dataset
from datasets import Dataset
data = {
"question": ["What is RAG?"],
"answer": ["RAG stands for Retrieval-Augmented Generation..."],
"contexts": [["RAG is a technique that..."]],
"ground_truth": ["RAG is..."]
}
dataset = Dataset.from_dict(data)
Running Evaluation
from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import faithfulness, answer_relevancy
result = evaluate(dataset=dataset, metrics=[faithfulness, answer_relevancy])
print(result)
Interpreting Scores
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| >0.90 | Excellent -- production ready |
| 0.80-0.90 | Good -- minor improvements |
| 0.60-0.80 | Needs work |
| <0.60 | Poor |
| ## Common Issues | |
| 1. Low context precision (<0.7): Vector search returns irrelevant docs | |
| 2. Low faithfulness (<0.8): LLM adds info not in context | |
| 3. Low answer relevancy (<0.8): LLM misses the question | |
| ## RAGAS vs DeepEval | |
| Feature | RAGAS |
| --------- | ------- |
| Stars | 14,855 |
| Focus | RAG pipeline |
| Metrics | 6 core |
| CI/CD | Manual |
| ## Bottom Line | |
| Start with RAGAS for essential metrics. Add DeepEval for advanced features. | |
| All data from GitHub API on 2026-07-16. |
Written by our editorial team; tools listed here are tested or verified against public sources. Links point to official sites or GitHub repos for reference only โ no paid placements.
