I asked AI to write like me - it wrote three versions, none were me
🩺 Summary
I fed an AI 10 of my blog posts and asked it to write a new post as me. It produced three versions - artsy, funny, professional - all good, none authentic. Writing style is not a pattern, it is a person.
📝 Details
I had this idea on a lazy Sunday: feed an AI my last 10 blog posts and ask it to write a post in my style.
The AI analyzed my writing and said: Your style features short sentences, rhythmic pacing, first-person, rhetorical questions.
It delivered three versions.
Artsy: Go is like a glass of plain water. Tasteless at first, sweet on the aftertaste. - This reads like Murakami after a compiler course. Not me.
Funny: Day 1: What sorcery is this? Day 3: Why am I wasting life on slices? - I do not write like this.
Professional: Go type system achieves elegant balance... - Actively avoid this style.
All three were good. None were me.
I realized the AI did not learn my style. It learned statistical features that correlate with what I have written. My posts were not written by applying a style - they were me thinking and typing. Style is a byproduct, not the goal.
I ended up writing the Go article myself. Halfway through, I typed: Go error handling is genuinely tedious. That sentence was not polished, was not styled, was not planned. It was just true. And that sentence - that was me.
Use AI as an editor, not a ghostwriter. Write raw thoughts first, then ask AI to tighten the language.
💬 Comments (0)